Jun 20 2009
iPhone 3G S Mini-Review
Overall pretty great. Obviously twice as fast, very snappy/responsive. It loads websites much faster, etc. Me and my friend Arun did some side-by-side-by-side tests at work yesterday between all three iPhones that have been relesed. Here are the results for loading macrumors.com:
- iPhone 3G S: 10 seconds
- iPhone 3G: 17 seconds
- iPhone: 4 minutes, 24 seconds
The original iPhone only had access to a low-bar EDGE connection (Both of these tests were over cell networks, not wifi). We also tried a few other sites which the 3G S similarly dominated, but I remember also clocking Google News (Classic/Desktop version) at:
- iPhone 3G S: 7 seconds
- iPhone 3G: 14 seconds
- iPhone: didn’t bother due to battery complaints from owner =D
Now, I didn’t have my iPhone 3G OS updated to 3.0 for these tests, and I honestly feel that the upgrade has shaved off about 2 seconds of website loading time. But the 3G S is definitely much faster, and also when scrolling around web pages while zoomed in - you don’t that checkerboard background while part of the page loads into memory like you do with the 3G/original. Launching apps/doing other things on the 3G S is also much faster.
The compass feature is cool especially in Google Maps, and I really like the new camera/auto-focus/exposure/macro system - that is one of the coolest parts, along with the very smooth video recording/playback, with upload to YouTube direct. The only thing I’m not really sure I like is the slight change of screen hue. It’s a close call, but I think that my iPhone 3G screen does look slightly better. But yeah, the iPhone 3G S is pretty damn nice!



